Glasscade / Analytics / Signals Lab
What changed in tracked activity.
Growth, address participation, market structure, sources, and payment dimensions.

Program growth
+Eight selected8/8
Weekly totals; dates mark week endings (Sunday). The current partial week is excluded. Each line uses the median of four trailing positive weeks after weekly volume reaches $10K. Programs first observed after the window opens are separated from programs with prior history. Compare the multiple with current volume and absolute change; this is tracked activity, not revenue or valuation.
Tracked Activity Profile
Select program
Quadrants use medians of the displayed top-volume programs on logarithmic axes. Event definitions differ by program; settlement-basis programs such as Karta and KAST reflect batched issuer transfers, not average consumer card purchases.
Market bubbles
Which programs are growing, and which are slowing down?
KAST recorded the largest USD move: +$15.2M in monthly spending.
Address lifecycle mix
Up to three complete months of address mix, grouped by time since first observation. Active counts are monthly averages; returning trends compare the latest three-month average count with the preceding three months. This is lifecycle composition, not customer retention.
Address mix unavailable for RedotPay.
Growth decomposition
Average monthly tracked volume rose by $28.2M. Active addresses was the largest measured contributor.
Change linked to the average number of active addresses.
Change linked to tracked events per active address.
Change linked to the average value of tracked events.
Interpretation boundaryCoverage through Sep 22, 26. Addresses are not people, and tracked events may not equal individual consumer purchases.
Source and activity basis
The inclusive view adds available top-up activity. It is not a top-ups-only total.
Payment dimensions
Market structure
Volume spread out. Growth became less broad.
How this is calculatedTechnical definitions, thresholds, and boundaries
Share of named-program volume belonging to the five largest programs.
One divided by the sum of squared program shares. The result is an equivalent count, not a literal program count.
Growing programs receive full weight, stable programs receive half weight, and contracting programs receive no weight.
Share of eligible starting volume represented by programs classified as expanding.
